2 thoughts on “What’s in a name? Curation beyond collections

  1. Thanks for sharing your insights into your experiences with changing definitions of curatorship. In all of these cases, it seems that the notion of expertise is still alive and well. Whether you’re arranging and organizing objects or people, as a curator, you are still providing a useful and respected service. With the counterpoint conversations about crowd-sourcing and curation by the public, do you feel that there is still a strong demand for the figure in the middle designing and arranging the world around her?

  2. Hi Adina,
    Thanks for your comments. I think there is still a need – and a demand – for someone with some expertise who is helping provide perspective or curatorship in all realms. But, I think our definition of who holds that expertise, and what that expertise should or could look like, has changed drastically. So, in many settings anyway, the field is open to a lot more people than it may have been previously. What do you think?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>